How do you know when its over?
How do you know when you aent over someone else?
How do you know your in love?
simple questions who got answers???
Posts
40th parallel europe
4 years ago
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Stuff White People LIke..
#128 Camping
#127 Where the Wild Things Are
#126 Vespa Scooters
#125 Bob Marley
#124 Hating People Who Wear Ed Hardy
#123 Mad Men
#122 Moleskine Notebooks
#121 Funny or Ironic Tattoos
#120 Taking a Year Off
#119 Sea Salt
#118 Ugly Sweater Parties
#117 Political Prisoners
#116 Black Music that Black People Don’t Listen to Anymore
#115 Promising to Learn a New Language
#114 America
#113 Halloween
#112 Hummus
#111 Pea Coats
#110 Frisbee Sports
#109 The Onion
#108 Appearing to Enjoy Classical Music
#107 Self Aware Hip Hop References
#106 Facebook
#105 Unpaid Internships
#104 Girls with Bangs
#103 Sweaters
#102 Children’s Games as Adults
#101 Being Offended
#100 Bumper Stickers
#99 Grammar
#98 The Ivy League
#97 Scarves
#96 New Balance Shoes
#95 Rugby
#94 Free Healthcare
#93 Music Piracy
#92 Book Deals
#91 San Francisco
#90 Dinner Parties
#89 St. Patrick’s Day
#88 Having Gay Friends
#87 Outdoor Performance Clothes
#86 Shorts
#85 The Wire
#84 T-Shirts
#83 Bad Memories of High School
#82 Hating Corporations
#81 Graduate School
#80 The Idea of Soccer
#79 Modern Furniture
#78 Multilingual Children
#77 Musical Comedy
#76 Bottles of Water
#75 Threatening to Move to Canada
#74 Oscar Parties
#73 Gentrification
#72 Study Abroad
#71 Being the only white person around
#70 Difficult Breakups
#69 Mos Def
#68 Michel Gondry
#67 Standing Still at Concerts
#66 Divorce
#65 Co-Ed Sports
#64 Recycling
#63 Expensive Sandwiches
#62 Knowing What’s Best for Poor People
#61 Bicycles
#60 Toyota Prius
#59 Natural Medicine
#58 Japan
#57 Juno
#56 Lawyers
#55 Apologies
#54 Kitchen Gadgets
#53 Dogs
#52 Sarah Silverman
#51 Living by the Water
#50 Irony
#49 Vintage
#48 Whole Foods and Grocery Co-ops
#47 Arts Degrees
#46 The Sunday New York Times
#45 Asian Fusion Food
#44 Public Radio
#43 Plays
#42 Sushi
#41 Indie Music
#40 Apple Products
#39 Netflix
#38 Arrested Development
#37 Renovations
#36 Breakfast Places
#35 The Daily Show/Colbert Report
#34 Architecture
#33 Marijuana
#32 Vegan/Vegetarianism
#31 Snowboarding
#30 Wrigley Field
#29 80s Night
#28 Not having a TV
#27 Marathons
#26 Manhattan (now Brooklyn too!)
#25 David Sedaris
#24 Wine
#23 Microbreweries
#22 Having Two Last Names
#21 Writers Workshops
#20 Being an expert on YOUR culture
#19 Traveling
#18 Awareness
#17 Hating their Parents
#16 Gifted Children
#15 Yoga
#14 Having Black Friends
#13 Tea
#12 Non-Profit Organizations
#11 Asian Girls
#10 Wes Anderson Movies
#9 Making you feel bad about not going outside
#8 Barack Obama
#7 Diversity
#6 Organic Food
#5 Farmer’s Markets
#4 Assists
#3 Film Festivals
#2 Religions their parents don’t belong to
#1 Coffee
#127 Where the Wild Things Are
#126 Vespa Scooters
#125 Bob Marley
#124 Hating People Who Wear Ed Hardy
#123 Mad Men
#122 Moleskine Notebooks
#121 Funny or Ironic Tattoos
#120 Taking a Year Off
#119 Sea Salt
#118 Ugly Sweater Parties
#117 Political Prisoners
#116 Black Music that Black People Don’t Listen to Anymore
#115 Promising to Learn a New Language
#114 America
#113 Halloween
#112 Hummus
#111 Pea Coats
#110 Frisbee Sports
#109 The Onion
#108 Appearing to Enjoy Classical Music
#107 Self Aware Hip Hop References
#106 Facebook
#105 Unpaid Internships
#104 Girls with Bangs
#103 Sweaters
#102 Children’s Games as Adults
#101 Being Offended
#100 Bumper Stickers
#99 Grammar
#98 The Ivy League
#97 Scarves
#96 New Balance Shoes
#95 Rugby
#94 Free Healthcare
#93 Music Piracy
#92 Book Deals
#91 San Francisco
#90 Dinner Parties
#89 St. Patrick’s Day
#88 Having Gay Friends
#87 Outdoor Performance Clothes
#86 Shorts
#85 The Wire
#84 T-Shirts
#83 Bad Memories of High School
#82 Hating Corporations
#81 Graduate School
#80 The Idea of Soccer
#79 Modern Furniture
#78 Multilingual Children
#77 Musical Comedy
#76 Bottles of Water
#75 Threatening to Move to Canada
#74 Oscar Parties
#73 Gentrification
#72 Study Abroad
#71 Being the only white person around
#70 Difficult Breakups
#69 Mos Def
#68 Michel Gondry
#67 Standing Still at Concerts
#66 Divorce
#65 Co-Ed Sports
#64 Recycling
#63 Expensive Sandwiches
#62 Knowing What’s Best for Poor People
#61 Bicycles
#60 Toyota Prius
#59 Natural Medicine
#58 Japan
#57 Juno
#56 Lawyers
#55 Apologies
#54 Kitchen Gadgets
#53 Dogs
#52 Sarah Silverman
#51 Living by the Water
#50 Irony
#49 Vintage
#48 Whole Foods and Grocery Co-ops
#47 Arts Degrees
#46 The Sunday New York Times
#45 Asian Fusion Food
#44 Public Radio
#43 Plays
#42 Sushi
#41 Indie Music
#40 Apple Products
#39 Netflix
#38 Arrested Development
#37 Renovations
#36 Breakfast Places
#35 The Daily Show/Colbert Report
#34 Architecture
#33 Marijuana
#32 Vegan/Vegetarianism
#31 Snowboarding
#30 Wrigley Field
#29 80s Night
#28 Not having a TV
#27 Marathons
#26 Manhattan (now Brooklyn too!)
#25 David Sedaris
#24 Wine
#23 Microbreweries
#22 Having Two Last Names
#21 Writers Workshops
#20 Being an expert on YOUR culture
#19 Traveling
#18 Awareness
#17 Hating their Parents
#16 Gifted Children
#15 Yoga
#14 Having Black Friends
#13 Tea
#12 Non-Profit Organizations
#11 Asian Girls
#10 Wes Anderson Movies
#9 Making you feel bad about not going outside
#8 Barack Obama
#7 Diversity
#6 Organic Food
#5 Farmer’s Markets
#4 Assists
#3 Film Festivals
#2 Religions their parents don’t belong to
#1 Coffee
Sunday, September 27, 2009
BAD MOVE DUDE
"If you love something let it go "
..said by a pussy and used by pussies ever since...yep I said it. If you stupid enough to let the one you love walk then you deserve to get left.
..said by a pussy and used by pussies ever since...yep I said it. If you stupid enough to let the one you love walk then you deserve to get left.
Friday, September 25, 2009
Queen of Hip Hop Soul
psssssh HAHA.
She was down with the Autotune.
And brought drake along for the ride on her newest track
Whyyyyy?
I cant tell you.
Listening to her music through the years.
you start to see that all she does it follow the trend
what ever is hot at the moment
is what she is doing
instead of sticking to that classic sound that she came in the game with.
So Mary J Blidge I dub you the Court Jester of Hip Hop Soul.
now maybe you can quit all the screaming you do and sing one of these songs for once.
She was down with the Autotune.
And brought drake along for the ride on her newest track
Whyyyyy?
I cant tell you.
Listening to her music through the years.
you start to see that all she does it follow the trend
what ever is hot at the moment
is what she is doing
instead of sticking to that classic sound that she came in the game with.
So Mary J Blidge I dub you the Court Jester of Hip Hop Soul.
now maybe you can quit all the screaming you do and sing one of these songs for once.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
WOW she a cold freak
I've learned so much about sex.
straight sex.
the kind of sex i don't have
................
fun facts about the ladies i've met in school
chick 1 - she swallows.
chick 2 - her friends are even freakier then her
chick 3 - when she goes home for the weekends . she gets her freak on.
chick 4 - lls which give me the room to myself to do just the same
chick 5 - she likes to get the head.
- long story short theyyyyyy NASTY -
straight sex.
the kind of sex i don't have
................
fun facts about the ladies i've met in school
chick 1 - she swallows.
chick 2 - her friends are even freakier then her
chick 3 - when she goes home for the weekends . she gets her freak on.
chick 4 - lls which give me the room to myself to do just the same
chick 5 - she likes to get the head.
- long story short theyyyyyy NASTY -
(REPOST) But yeah..You Weren't Born That Way.. Your Argument Fail
Before You Read. I must claim. this is a repost and I lay no claim to this work
Its not Mine. I didnt write it. Didnt even read it the whole way through,
Just food for thought
We are born heterosexual! Womp Womp Womp...I want factual information...pretty much kills your credibility and when you use no scientific research or resource to back up your claim. Even Anne Coulter uses research no matter if it is rigged and complete hog wash she has research and sources to back her claims.
http://www.downelink.com/blogs/view.aspx?id=682996&blogid=1083072
Let's understand Nature vs. Nurture first.
The nature versus nurture debates concern the relative importance of an individual's innate qualities ("nature", i.e. nativism, or innatism) versus personal experiences ("nurture", i.e. empiricism or behaviorism) in determining or causing individual differences in physical and behavioral traits.
The view that humans acquire all or almost all their behavioral traits from "nurture" is known as tabula rasa ("blank slate"). This question was once considered to be an appropriate division of developmental influences, but since both types of factors are known to play such interacting roles in development, many modern psychologists consider the question naive - representing an outdated state of knowledge. Psychologist Donald Hebb is said to have once answered a journalist's question of "which, nature or nurture, contributes more to personality?" by asking in response, "which contributes more to the area of a rectangle, its length or its width?"
Psychological Nativism:
In the field of psychology, nativism is the view that certain skills or abilities are 'native' or hard wired into the brain at birth. This is in contrast to empiricism, the 'blank slate' or tabula rasa view, which states that the brain has inborn capabilities for learning from the environment but does not contain content such as innate beliefs.
Some nativists believe that specific beliefs or preferences are hard wired. For example, one might argue that some moral intuitions are innate or that color preferences are innate. A less established argument is that nature supplies the human mind with specialized learning devices. This latter view differs from empiricism only to the extent that the algorithms that translate experience into information may be more complex and specialized in nativist theories than in empiricist theories. However, empiricists largely remain open to the nature of learning algorithms and are by no means restricted to the historical associationist mechanisms of behaviorism.
We have this natural urge to be with the opposite sex?
So the ones who do not have these natural urges are diseased? I am attracted to the opposite sex but I do not wish to be intimate with the opposite sex, so what does that make me? The APA recently brought this topic up again about people wishing to change their sexual orientation to be apart of socionormatives.
"Contrary to claims of sexual orientation change advocates and practitioners, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of psychological interventions to change sexual orientation," said Judith M. Glassgold, PsyD, chair of the task force. "Scientifically rigorous older studies in this area found that sexual orientation was unlikely to change due to efforts designed for this purpose. Contrary to the claims of SOCE practitioners and advocates, recent research studies do not provide evidence of sexual orientation change as the research methods are inadequate to determine the effectiveness of these interventions." Glassgold added: "At most, certain studies suggested that some individuals learned how to ignore or not act on their homosexual attractions. Yet, these studies did not indicate for whom this was possible, how long it lasted or its long-term mental health effects. Also, this result was much less likely to be true for people who started out only attracted to people of the same sex."
Also when we speak of choices, remember the act of homosexuality is a choice no shit and the same can be said for heterosexuals! You can supress the choice of being with someone of the same sex no matter your reasoning but the desire does not go away. This is why I do not believe in Ex Homosexuality brainwashing bullshit because you were either desiring someone of the same sex in the first place or you just labeled yourself. We need to start teaching the Kinsey Scale more and maybe this will not happen. All of this has been around since the 1970s why are people being so naive in 2009?
My RESOURCES!
You can read all of this if you please instead of your fuckery Google : )
http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/therapeutic-response.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_nativism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurture
Its not Mine. I didnt write it. Didnt even read it the whole way through,
Just food for thought
We are born heterosexual! Womp Womp Womp...I want factual information...pretty much kills your credibility and when you use no scientific research or resource to back up your claim. Even Anne Coulter uses research no matter if it is rigged and complete hog wash she has research and sources to back her claims.
http://www.downelink.com/blogs/view.aspx?id=682996&blogid=1083072
Let's understand Nature vs. Nurture first.
The nature versus nurture debates concern the relative importance of an individual's innate qualities ("nature", i.e. nativism, or innatism) versus personal experiences ("nurture", i.e. empiricism or behaviorism) in determining or causing individual differences in physical and behavioral traits.
The view that humans acquire all or almost all their behavioral traits from "nurture" is known as tabula rasa ("blank slate"). This question was once considered to be an appropriate division of developmental influences, but since both types of factors are known to play such interacting roles in development, many modern psychologists consider the question naive - representing an outdated state of knowledge. Psychologist Donald Hebb is said to have once answered a journalist's question of "which, nature or nurture, contributes more to personality?" by asking in response, "which contributes more to the area of a rectangle, its length or its width?"
Psychological Nativism:
In the field of psychology, nativism is the view that certain skills or abilities are 'native' or hard wired into the brain at birth. This is in contrast to empiricism, the 'blank slate' or tabula rasa view, which states that the brain has inborn capabilities for learning from the environment but does not contain content such as innate beliefs.
Some nativists believe that specific beliefs or preferences are hard wired. For example, one might argue that some moral intuitions are innate or that color preferences are innate. A less established argument is that nature supplies the human mind with specialized learning devices. This latter view differs from empiricism only to the extent that the algorithms that translate experience into information may be more complex and specialized in nativist theories than in empiricist theories. However, empiricists largely remain open to the nature of learning algorithms and are by no means restricted to the historical associationist mechanisms of behaviorism.
We have this natural urge to be with the opposite sex?
So the ones who do not have these natural urges are diseased? I am attracted to the opposite sex but I do not wish to be intimate with the opposite sex, so what does that make me? The APA recently brought this topic up again about people wishing to change their sexual orientation to be apart of socionormatives.
"Contrary to claims of sexual orientation change advocates and practitioners, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of psychological interventions to change sexual orientation," said Judith M. Glassgold, PsyD, chair of the task force. "Scientifically rigorous older studies in this area found that sexual orientation was unlikely to change due to efforts designed for this purpose. Contrary to the claims of SOCE practitioners and advocates, recent research studies do not provide evidence of sexual orientation change as the research methods are inadequate to determine the effectiveness of these interventions." Glassgold added: "At most, certain studies suggested that some individuals learned how to ignore or not act on their homosexual attractions. Yet, these studies did not indicate for whom this was possible, how long it lasted or its long-term mental health effects. Also, this result was much less likely to be true for people who started out only attracted to people of the same sex."
Also when we speak of choices, remember the act of homosexuality is a choice no shit and the same can be said for heterosexuals! You can supress the choice of being with someone of the same sex no matter your reasoning but the desire does not go away. This is why I do not believe in Ex Homosexuality brainwashing bullshit because you were either desiring someone of the same sex in the first place or you just labeled yourself. We need to start teaching the Kinsey Scale more and maybe this will not happen. All of this has been around since the 1970s why are people being so naive in 2009?
My RESOURCES!
You can read all of this if you please instead of your fuckery Google : )
http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbc/publications/therapeutic-response.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_nativism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurture
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
